新闻今日谈

‘Hong Kong Alliance’ found guilty of inciting subversion; verdict clarifies boundaries between free speech and national security_我的网站

一 | 据Mashdigi称，三星的外骨骼佩戴宝石也已由三星发布。它强调，该产品不同于竞争对手的LG的处理设计和其他辅助工作的使用理念。    

    West Kowloon Law Courts Building in Hong Kong Photo: VCG
The anti-China group "Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China", along with its former chairman and vice-chairpersons Lee Cheuk-yan, Albert Ho Chun-yan and Chow Hang-tung, were charged with inciting others to subvert state power and have been remanded in custody since then. The local court in Hong Kong found two defendants guilty on Friday, and Ho pleaded guilty before the trial began, local media reported. 
The central government's office for safeguarding national security in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) voiced support for the court's lawful prosecution on Friday, saying that the verdict demonstrates the spirit of the rule of law and upholds the authority of the National Security Law (NSL) for Hong Kong. 
The HKSAR government also welcomed the court's guilty verdict. HKSAR Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said that for a long time, the Hong Kong Alliance had deliberately sown seeds of hatred toward the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the central government in Hong Kong society. Through various means, it sought to incite feelings of dislike and hatred toward the CPC and the central government among members of the public, and to encourage the public to subvert state power, RTHK reported. 
The defendants' long-standing conduct endangered national security, and their plot was plainly evident and had to be punished, Lee said.
Inciting subversion of state power is an extremely serious offense, he said. The HKSAR government has a responsibility to safeguard national security and will resolutely prevent, stop and punish acts and activities that endanger national security, Lee noted. 
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out how Hong Kong courts understand and apply the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, some legal experts said. 
Looking back at the case, the prosecution and defense engaged in intense legal arguments over the boundaries between freedom of expression and national security, with the core dispute going to the constitutional and legal limits under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework, Willy Fu, a law professor who is also the director of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong & Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday. 
In its closing submissions, the prosecution argued that the defendants' long-standing slogan of "ending one-party rule" was not merely a political advocacy campaign, but was essentially aimed at rejecting the leadership of the CPC and attempting to subvert the fundamental system of the state, Fu continued. 
Such conduct, the prosecution argued, went far beyond the scope of freedom of expression protected by the Basic Law and the NSL for Hong Kong, and constituted an objective act of inciting subversion of state power through "unlawful means," Fu said. 
In this case, the local court in Hong Kong clearly set out the Hong Kong courts' understanding and application of the provisions of the Chinese Constitution. The ruling will also serve as a legal principle and precedent, providing an important reference for future cases. It is consistent with legal principles and carries legal force, Chu Kar-kin, a veteran commentator based in the HKSAR and member of the Chinese Association of Hong Kong and Macao Studies, told the Global Times on Friday. 
Hong Kong judges likewise need to receive comprehensive and systematic education on China's national Constitution, Chu said. 
The Constitution is the fundamental law of the state and the most important component of the constitutional order of the HKSAR. The core of the constitutional order of the state is the establishment of the CPC's position as the governing party. The Preamble to the Constitution makes it clear that the leadership by the CPC is the core and foundation of the constitutional order of the PRC, a spokesperson from the HKSAR government said on Friday. 
The HKSAR is an inalienable part of the PRC. The state provides the fundamental guarantee for the prosperity and development of Hong Kong, and the highest principle of "One Country, Two Systems" is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests, the spokesperson said. 
The HKSAR Government will resolutely safeguard the fundamental system of the state established by the Constitution and the security of state power, and will, in strict accordance with the principle of the rule of law, prevent, suppress and punish acts and activities endangering national security with full force and in accordance with the law, the spokesperson added. 
。最重要的是为行动不便、受伤康复或运动训练的人建造它，其中GEMS-H和GEMS-H根据不同的使用需求有更大的区别。A、GEMS-K三种规格。

二 | 图.从mashdigi，gems-h只驱动大腿和肢体的上运动来辅助，主要是帮助使用者从坐姿站起来或坐下，也通过辅助指导使用者在健身过程中正确的运动。在踝关节处佩戴GEMS-A，避免老年人在不稳定行走时意外摔倒或切口固定位置受伤。戴在身体下部的gems-k比gems-h提供更完整的下肢辅助和更先进的辅助效果。但是，gems-k的主要用途不是为处理和其他工作而设计的，而是为日常使用，或为体育训练、康复和其他需要而设计的。

三 | _图从mashdigi的同时，也为实际使用的易磨损的吸引力，所有固定的方式都是由魔术贴粘合，取下只需要撕下魔术贴，而整体重量不会给用户带来额外的负担。

四 | 所有三星gems都使用内置电池电源。一般来说，可以连续使用2小时左右。然而，根据每个动作的使用情况，它们只能以助推的形式使用，而不能以持续输出的形式使用。

五 | 如果它们平均分布在每个使用需求中，它们仍然大致相当于大约一天的使用时间。至于设计本身，它不采用高档防水规格，就像一般家用电器产品采用防水设计一样。然而，自从Mashdigi以来，三星没有计划建造一个应用设备来满足人类上肢运动的需要。主要原因是三星的gems仍然专注于培训援助，但长期以来并没有取代用户的努力。

六 | 因此，长期使用不足会导致使用者肌肉萎缩，对上肢运动的需求可能增加。对于复杂性，现阶段我们将重点帮助提高机动性、运动训练、康复等需求，同时也将与医院合作进口三星宝石系列。

Current article:http://vy9lr.runtunpaixufenjuduishuang.pics/list_ukx2r/ktgc772.html

Published on:08:11:57